As I told a relative when he started running Tiger on his G4: 'There's next to no sunlight between the two.

And in terms of just out-of-the-box networking between Macs & PCs, the vanilla user version of Tiger practically eliminated any coughs, chokes and hangups between Apple's SMB protocol and Microsoft's. We support operating systems that not even Microsoft and Apple themselves support anymore, such as macOS X on PowerPC Macs, and RetroArch being available on Windows OSes as far back as. I have done a little with Apple's X11 distribution - of which on this Forum you'll find scads of discussion and info - in OS X, and I agree it does make up the difference between the two ( or is it three now ? ) platforms. RetroArch can run on the usual platforms like Windows, Mac OS X and Linux, but it stands alone in that it can support far more platforms beyond just that. trying to run SSE2 code on Pentium 1 will cause instant crash). If you will use code which is not checking whether CPU has some feature from more modern CPUs, it'll cause instant crash (e.g. Virtual machine imaging Mac OS X has its own legal issues: the only 'Ten Version' as I like to phrase it where Apple's lawyers would be inclined to look the other way if someone virtualised it is (drum roll please) OS X 10.4 Tiger server. Use Windows dxdiag to check what CPU is installed physically, and use MacOS X equivalent for the same, compare whether VirtualBox is not detected wrong CPU. Those that exist for the direction you're choosing, even the commercial ones, have their own issues and are generally considered not worth the time money or effort. Operating system emulators tend to favor going the other way - Mac to Windows. As a long time Mac user (work and home, classic and OS X), I agree with pludi. Developers also prefer this iPhone emulator for Windows 10 due to the integrated WebKit and Chrome debugging tools that make their jobs easier.

Mac os x emulator for windows 10